From Egypt to Cincinnati: The Legal Battle of Imam Ayman Soliman

By: Arab America Contributing Writer / Layla Mahmoud
In July 2025, Imam Ayman Soliman, a well-known religious leader in Cincinnati’s Muslim community, found himself at the center of a legal storm that covered issues of immigration, religious freedom, and national security. His story—spanning persecution in Egypt, asylum in the United States, and now detention by U.S. authorities—shows the dangerous reality faced by many immigrants navigating faith and politics. Arab America Contributing Writer Layla Mahmoud examines how Soliman’s case raises pressing questions about due process and the rights of asylum seekers in America.
From Egypt to America
Soliman fled Egypt in 2005 after enduring harassment and threats under the Mubarak regime. As a Coptic Christian convert to Islam and a vocal imam, he became a target of both religious and political hostility. Fearing persecution, he sought asylum in the United States, where he settled in Cincinnati and built a reputation as a respected faith leader. Over two decades, he guided congregants, provided community services, and became a prominent local voice against extremism and violence. Despite his contributions, Soliman’s asylum process remained unresolved for years. His case lingered in the immigration system, a symbol of the political complications that often delay asylum claims. For Soliman, the uncertainty became a constant backdrop to his life in America.
The Arrest and Lawsuit
In 2023, Soliman was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during what was supposed to be a routine check-in. His supporters argue that the detention was arbitrary, politically motivated, and a violation of his rights as an asylum seeker. Soliman has since filed a lawsuit against the FBI and other federal agencies, alleging unlawful targeting based on his religious identity and political speech. The lawsuit points to surveillance and profiling practices that have disproportionately affected Muslim leaders in the United States since 9/11. Soliman’s lawyers argue that his detention represents not only an individual injustice but also a broader trend of systemic bias in U.S. counterterrorism and immigration policies.
Community and National Reactions
Soliman’s arrest has galvanized support from local faith leaders, immigrant rights groups, and civil liberties advocates. Many view his case as a test of America’s commitment to religious freedom and asylum protections. Demonstrations in Cincinnati have drawn attention to the risks faced by immigrants who speak out against persecution abroad, only to encounter new forms of suspicion in the U.S. At the same time, critics of Soliman argue that the government is justified in scrutinizing individuals with complex international backgrounds, especially religious leaders with political influence.
The Larger Implications
The case of Ayman Soliman resonates beyond Cincinnati. It touches on unresolved questions about how the U.S. handles asylum seekers fleeing religious or political persecution, particularly from the Middle East and North Africa. It also shows the vulnerability of immigrant leaders who occupy higher roles in their communities yet remain legally precarious. Advocates warn that if Soliman’s detention sets a precedent, it could have a strong effect on immigrant leaders across the country. By doubting the security of asylum protections, the case risks deterring others from seeking refuge or speaking out against authoritarian regimes.
Looking Ahead
As Soliman’s legal battle continues to unfold, the stakes are high. A favorable ruling could reaffirm protections for asylum seekers and limit the government’s ability to arbitrarily detain immigrants. An unfavorable outcome, however, could reinforce fears that America’s asylum system is vulnerable to political pressures and discriminatory practices. For now, Soliman remains in detention, his fate uncertain. What is certain is that his story has become a symbol of the struggles faced by countless immigrants caught between persecution abroad and suspicion at home. The outcome of his case may shape not only his future but also the future of America’s approach to asylum and religious freedom.
Want more articles like this? Sign up for our e-newsletter!
Check out our blog here!






