Pro-Palestine Advocacy and Freedom in U.S. Universities: The Case of Columbia

posted on: Jul 30, 2025

By: Layla Mahmoud / Arab America Contributing Writer

In the wake of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, U.S. college campuses have become a battleground for speech, protest, and political expression. At the center of this tension is Columbia University, where pro-Palestine student advocacy has ignited nationwide debates about academic freedom, censorship, and the rights of student protestors. While the university has historically been a site of political activism, recent administrative crackdowns, police interventions, and faculty silencing have prompted widespread concern.

Historical Context: A Legacy of Protest

Columbia has a storied history of campus protest. Pro-Palestine activism is not new to its campus, but the scale, urgency, and backlash seen in recent months have increased. Students and faculty staging peaceful protests against the U.S.’s complicity in Israeli actions have faced suspensions, public doxxing, and expulsion or arrest. These responses echo broader patterns across U.S. campuses, where pro-Palestinian speech is frequently conflated with antisemitism and raises questions about selective enforcement and institutional bias.

Administrative Suppression and Police Presence

In April 2024, Columbia’s administration authorized the NYPD to forcibly remove students occupying the campus lawn in protest. The occupation, modeled after anti-apartheid demonstrations of the 1980s, was largely peaceful. It aimed at pushing the university to divest from companies profiting from the Israeli occupation. The administration framed the removal as necessary for safety, but critics argued it was a disproportionate response rooted in political discomfort. Videos of police dragging students and locking buildings circulated widely. This gathered national support for the protestors and exposed what many saw as a double standard in how campus dissent is handled.

The Faculty Divide and Free Speech

Faculty members, too, have felt the chilling effect. Some professors who supported the students faced pressure to remain silent or were subjected to disciplinary review. Others signed open letters condemning both the university’s actions and the broader erosion of academic freedom. This has sparked a campus-wide reckoning: Can a university claim to promote free inquiry while punishing faculty and students who take moral stances on international crises? And why is support for Palestinian liberation specifically stigmatized?

Media Narratives and Public Perception

Mainstream media coverage of the Columbia protests has often mirrored the institutional bias. Headlines tend to emphasize disruption, risk, and controversy, putting aside the political demands of the protestors. Student activists, many of whom are Arab, Muslim, or Jewish allies, are painted as agitators rather than engaged citizens. This framing not only delegitimizes their cause but also fuels the public’s misunderstanding of the distinction between criticism of Israeli policy and antisemitism.

Solidarity and Resilience

Despite repression, the pro-Palestine student advocacy movement on campus has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Student coalitions, supported by alumni and faculty, have continued to organize teach-ins, hunger strikes, and walkouts. The movement has spread to dozens of universities across the U.S., forcing institutions to confront their financial ties to military contractors and foreign governments. More importantly, it has sparked critical conversations about what kind of political speech is protected and what kind is punished in American universities.

Conclusion

The situation at Columbia reflects a larger crisis in U.S. higher education: the politicization of academic freedom and the selective defense of speech rights. As universities grapple with global injustices and student bodies grow increasingly politicized, institutional neutrality is no longer a sustainable position. In this moment, the question is not simply whether students have the right to protest, but whether universities will continue to be sites of intellectual courage or succumb to the pressures of political convenience.

Want more articles like this? Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Check out our blog here!